
Which made me wonder, "Does Fiji water really come from Fiji?" I mean, really? It's a so far away from America. Truman Burbank told me so-"You can't get any further away before you start coming back" (Truman Show).
So, as anyone in my generation would do in order to research an question, I googled it. To my surprise, it actually does originate from the South Pacific Islands of Fiji. I could not believe that they actually ship that water 7,325 miles to my city of Lexington, Kentucky (I google "mapped" it). Which made me wonder, "Is it worth it?"
So, I did some more research, and it seems I was not the first to ask this question of the Fijian water company. First off, is this hurting the environment? Now, I'm not "green" in mostly any way. I don't recycle (I know, I know...), don't have solar panels on my apartment patio, and don't buy fully recycled grocery canvas bags. But, I do respect God's earth, and I hope to be a good steward of it. Anyways, one Fiji bottle is one liter, or 25g of plastic and and is made from PET (Polyethylene terephthalate)...thank-you, Dr. Brinkman (which, by the way, terephthalate is the single hardest word in the English language for me to pronounce).
Plastics of this type use around 6.45kg of oil per kg, 294.2kg of water per kg, and result in 3.723kg of greenhouse gas emissions per kg (http://www.petmachine.in/use_of_pet.htm). So, with a quick stoichiometry-like calculation on my Ti-83 (200kg/kg x 0.025kg[fossil fuels] = 5kg of water), 1 liter requires 5 liters of water in its manufacturing process. In other words, it requires 5x the amount of water to produce the one liter of it.

But, I also wanted to know how much it costs to ship Fiji H20 from Fiji. Let’s assume that the bottle producing company (which I also assume is not the Fiji company) and the shipping company charges 2x what it costs for them to produce it. I am not sure if these are valid assumptions, but who cares, it's just a blog, right? So, according to a groundbreaking research article in the Journal of Consumer Culture ("Bottled Water: The Pure Commodity") 160g of fossil fuels are used to make the bottle, 2g to deliver it to Fiji, (from China-our plastic maker) and 81g to deliver the full bottle to the me, in Kentucky.
So, going back to my macroeconomic class in college, the variable (opposite of fixed) cost is the fossil fuel (since we all know that the water that springs from the ground is free), which amounts to 0.25kg. A standard oil barrel holds 159 liters and one liter of oil weighs 850g/liter, therefore one barrel holds 135.15kg of oil (opec.com). One barrel costs between $50 and $70 (let’s say $60, unless OPEC decides to throw a tantrum), so 0.25kg would cost $0.11 (1 barrel/135.15kg x $60/barrel x 0.243kg). Then, since we assumed that the company charges 2x what it costs to produce, we'll say $.22. That's right - not even a fourth of a dollar for a liter of Fiji water. This leaves $3.78 for the manufacturer, retail store, etc.
Bottom line: drinking Fiji water is a colossal waste of money and an environmental absurdity. In fact, the Republic of Fiji is controlled by a military junta - a strict dictatorship. How does water bottled in a junta-controlled dictatorship get into the hands of Paris Hilton, Barack Obama, and Mary J. Blige (all of whom swear by it)? Morever, how does it become the epitome of chic?
To end this discussion, I leave you with a must-read article by Mother Jones Journalism called, "Fiji Water: Spin the Bottle." It outlines the ins-and-outs of how this dictatorship controls the P.R. of Fiji water.
On Fiji's website, one of their slogans reads, "And remember this—we saved you a trip to Fiji." I think I'll forget the Fijian trip and instead, reach into my fridge.
*Photo #1: http://www.prnewswire.com/mnr/purwater/37083/
*Photo #2: http://www.triplepundit.com/2009/08/does-drinking-fiji-water-prop-up-a-dictatorship/






